Color of our thoughts can either strengthen support for defending peace or increase the sense of urgency to tone down pro-tyranny rhetoric

That’s what success does—it bookends the chapters of our life. It breaks down our story with two pauses by demarcating the Before and the After parts of our life as Part One and Part Two. Most new evidence doesn’t disprove this understanding. For example, the tone of our thoughts can bolster, augment, or enhance support for defending peace. Or, it can heighten the sense of urgency to temper pro-tyranny rhetoric or intensify the sense of urgency to counter pro-tyranny rhetoric or magnify the sense of urgency to temper it. The tide of confusion in an attack on who threatens to harm can not be stemmed by just figuring out the indiscriminate activities that are carried out by perpetrators of crimes. The smart way to gain control over any nonsense narratives is using the built-in edge of our tested partners. For creating original and affordable options, we need to put the best foot forward. Otherwise, one can get frustrated and get shaken by weak ties if one is living in disinformation space as problems driving the cause of suffering could be multi-polar. Leadership could be designed to not go to sleep as people can be in dire need of direction as moral underpinnings resulting in failures can not be properly parsed. Violation of human rights in the face of raw aggression is a difficult situation. It may be quite difficult to take sides in a conflict, which can not be well defined. A signal can be sent to leaders at risk as a message of hope by partners. Alignment of minds is a necessary condition for stopping unacceptable actions of aggressors. Support can slide quickly if warning signs of extreme danger can start to appear. Most believe it is the start of the end of opposition. There is every indication that the efforts to bend the truth are just a gimmick as it is not a good strategy in the long run. The solutions may suugest that they may not have teeth and could be just political theater. Definitely, we likely face exceptional challenges in learning the real lessons of taking a moral high ground when it would be difficult to do so. Anybody can be accused of seedy deeds as the big concern may be who is aligned with whom. Demanding that concerns should be looked into so people can be kept going. A chainsaw approach to the public good can promote resentment in masses, considering a significant loss may be caused to the credibility of those who are in power to allow this to happen. A backup plan and focused action is needed indeed to end all the nonsense. But no one is capable of carrying this mandate without resistance. Let it not become a mere spectacle that awaits serious decisions.